Top Guidelines Of uocoming case law sanjha vs state
Top Guidelines Of uocoming case law sanjha vs state
Blog Article
III) Inside the version of your father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed on the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
14. In the light of your position explained previously mentioned, it really is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded as for no fault of his very own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency inside the duration of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave industry blank.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been with the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we've been crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue for the approval from the competent authority.
Reasonable grounds are available over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. While punishment of the alleged offence does not drop from the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is inside the credit on the petitioner as accused, therefore, case with the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, assistance has been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice can be a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.
The Court thought of the case to generally be maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were including to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
Section 302 in the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered to the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father in the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner is undoubtedly an eyewkness with the incidence.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration because of the Court under Article 184 (three), has been setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access to your public to solution the superior courts along with the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its prospective to secure financial read more interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of your Pakistan Constitution gives original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had nothing at all to worry about.